USPTO serial 86464047
VICTORIAN WOODWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VICTORIAN WOODWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edwards Cheshire Company Limited
Warrington, Cheshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bethany A. Stokes
BETHANY A. STOKES GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP1 INTERNATIONAL PLBOSTON, MA 02110-2602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Wooden boards and wooden flooring; wooden boards and wooden floor boards; floor tiles of wood; vinyl flooring; laminate flooring; non-metallic blocks for use in flooring construction; board material made of polyethylene used as a wood substitute; bamboo flooring; cork flooring; wooden floor tiles; wooden paneling; bamboo flooring; non-metallic floors comprised primarily of wood, plastic, vinyl, polyvinyl chloride, bamboo and cork for commercial and domestic indoor use; parquet flooring; flooring screeds; non-metallic flooring tiles; hardwood flooring; parquet flooring; parquet flooring and parquet slabs; parquet flooring made of cork; parquet flooring made of wood; parquet flooring of cork; parquet flooring of wood; parquet wood flooring; synthetic flooring materials or wall-claddings; tile floorings, not of metal; wooden tile floorings; floorboards; non-metallic floorboards; floor boards of non-metallic materials; parquet floor boards; floors not of metal; non-metal building materials, namely, soffits and fascias; non-metallic framed conservatories, doors and windows | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring wooden boards and wooden flooring, wooden boards and wooden floor boards, floor tiles of wood, vinyl flooring, laminate flooring, non-metallic blocks for use in flooring construction, board material made of polyethylene used as a wood substitute, bamboo flooring, cork flooring, wooden floor tiles, wooden paneling, bamboo flooring, non-metallic floors comprised primarily of wood, plastic, vinyl, polyvinyl chloride, bamboo and cork for commercial and domestic indoor use, parquet flooring, flooring screeds, non-metallic flooring tiles, hardwood flooring, parquet flooring, parquet flooring and parquet slabs, parquet flooring made of cork, parquet flooring made of wood, parquet flooring of cork, parquet flooring of wood, parquet wood flooring, synthetic flooring materials or wall-claddings, tile floorings, not of metal, wooden tile floorings, floorboards, non-metallic floorboards, floor boards of non-metallic materials, parquet floor boards, floors not of metal, non-metal building materials, namely, soffits and fascias, non-metallic framed conservatories, doors and windows; advice, information and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid services; all the aforementioned services also provided on-line from a computer database or from the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |