Drawing for CLEAR CHOICE PESTFREE BRAND

USPTO serial 86464428

CLEAR CHOICE PESTFREE BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TARCU, CATHERINE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CLEAR CHOICE PESTFREE BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carolyn Walters

Carolyn Walters Lawson Lundell LLP3700, 205-5th Ave SW, Bow Valley Sq2CALGARY, ALBERTA, T2P2V7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Fungicides; Insecticides; PesticidesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 4, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 1, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 31, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 20, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 16, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 22, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 26, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2014GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2014GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2014EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Dec 23, 2014CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance