USPTO serial 86464542
WE SAUCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WE SAUCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily Burns
EMILY BURNS GOOGLE INC1600 AMPHITHEATRE PKWYMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94043-1351UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper and stationery items, namely, notebooks, pens, pencils, adhesive backed stickers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Housewares and glassware, namely, beverage glassware, cups, mugs, lunch boxes, plastic water bottles sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing a website in the fields of popular science and the humanities for educational and entertainment purposes; providing a website featuring popular science and humanities information for educational and entertainment purposes; providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles in the fields of science and the humanities; entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the fields of science and humanities; digital video, audio, and multimedia publishing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | On-line social networking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VSAUCE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Google Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Google Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named WE SAUCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |