Drawing for THE LUXURY OF HEALTH

USPTO serial 86464857

THE LUXURY OF HEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LUXURY OF HEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Zinna

MICHAEL J. ZINNA Kelley Drye & Warren LLPOne Jefferson RoadParsippany, NJ 07054UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, books in the fields of fitness, yoga, exercise, health and nutritionACTIVE—
041Providing a website featuring information on fitness, yoga, and exercise; On-line journals, namely, blogs in the fields of fitness, yoga, exercise, health and nutrition; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable audio-visual content, specifically, videos, in the fields of fitness, yoga, exercise, health and nutritionACTIVE—
044Providing a website featuring information in the fields of health and nutritionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2015CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Mar 24, 2015CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2015EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Mar 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance