Drawing for CANDLE-LITE

USPTO serial 86465035

CANDLE-LITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANDLE-LITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica L. Dias

MONICA L. DIAS Frost Brown Todd Llc301 E 4th StCincinnati, OH 45202-4245UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Scented room sprays; fragrances for automobiles; car air fresheners, namely, air fragrancing preparations for use in cars; air fragrancing preparations; room fragrancing preparations; fragrance emitting wicks for room fragrance; refills for electric room fragrance dispensers; room fragrance refills for non-electric room fragrance dispensers; room fragrances; scented oils for use in electrical and non-electric scent dispensers, sonic fragrance diffusers, and catalytic fragrance diffusers; home fragrance oils; passive scent diffusers, namely, air diffusers comprised of a wick and oil in a container used to emit scent by diffusion into the air; aromatic or scented potpourri refresher oil; electric fragrance dispenser refills; scented oil and fragranced oil used to produce aromas when heated; refills for electric room fragrance dispensersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 30, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 22, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 26, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 6, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 22, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 22, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance