Drawing for GREEN CORE

USPTO serial 86465914

GREEN CORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN CORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Lantz

JENNIFER M. LANTZ HAYNES AND BOONE LLP2323 VICTORY AVENUE, SUITE 700DALLAS, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Motorcycles, scooters, three-wheeled motorcycles, three-wheeled scooters, electric motorcycles, electric scooters, electric three-wheeled motorcycles, electric three-wheeled scooters, electric assist bicycles and structural parts thereof; drive units for electric assist bicycles; engines and motors for motorcycles, scooters, three-wheeled motorcycles and three-wheeled scootersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 13, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 17, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance