USPTO serial 86466242
WIPAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WIPAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Solomon
STEVEN J. SOLOMON PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment and computers; monitoring and control systems, apparatus and equipment; programmable monitoring and control units; programmable local and remote control and monitoring units for monitoring and controlling mining plant and equipment and industrial plant and equipment for use in quarries, ports, steel works and power stations; monitoring and control systems, programmable monitoring and control units, conveyer protection devices and loudspeaker communications systems for use in mines, quarries, ports, steelworks, power stations, and/or for use in fans, pumps and bunkers; monitoring and control systems; tracking apparatus and equipment; apparatus and equipment for tracking and identifying personnel, vehicles and equipment; protection devices for industrial plant, equipment and apparatus; conveyer protection devices; belt protection devices; apparatus, equipment and devices for monitoring and protecting of conveyor belting and structure; detection apparatus, equipment and devices; warning apparatus, equipment and devices; communications apparatus, equipment and systems; loudspeaker communications apparatus, equipment and systems; cables; integrated loudspeaker communications systems; integrated monitoring and control systems for mining and other industrial applications; computer software and computer hardware; computer peripherals; power supplies and relays; telemetry systems; keypads; programmable electronic data recording apparatus; apparatus and equipment for use as on board vehicle recorders; driver logging and performance monitoring apparatus; apparatus for recording work operations and vehicle movements and events; vehicle control apparatus; monitoring devices, display devices; personnel and vehicle tracking apparatus; personnel and vehicle tracking apparatus using radio frequency identification technology (RFID); personnel and vehicle tracking apparatus for use in mines; computer networks; wireless communication apparatus; intrinsically safe wireless communication apparatus; closed circuit television cameras; visual display screens; low voltage switching devices; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |