USPTO serial 86466295
LEGNANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEGNANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 S JACKSON ST STE 200GLENDALE, CA 91205-4917UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Artichoke paste; Canned processed olives; Canned tomatoes; Cocktail onions; Compotes; Dipping oil in the nature of flavored olive oil; Dried fruit and vegetables; Edible fats; Edible oil; Eggs; Fish cakes; Fish croquettes; Fish mousse; Frozen fruits; Fruit preserves; Fruit salads; Gherkins; Jellies and jams; Meat extracts; Meat, fish, poultry and game, not live; Mushrooms puree; Olive pastes; Onion rings; Pickled fish; Pickled onions; Preserved fruit and vegetables; Preserved, dried and cooked olives; Processed artichokes; Processed mushrooms; Processed olive puree; Processed olives; Processed onions; Salami; Tinned olives; Tomato paste; Tomato puree; Vegetables, namely, vegetable preserves and sun-dried tomatoes; Frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | Dec 23, 2014 |
| 030 | Alimentary pasta; Artichoke sauce; Baking powder; Barbecue sauce; Breakfast cereals; Capers; Cereal based snack food; Cocoa; Coffee and tea; Coffee substitutes; Confectionery chips for baking; Flavored ices; Flour; Honey; Ice; Ketchup; Mayonnaise; Mustard; Onion salt; Pastries; Ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; Rice; Sago; Salt; Sauces; Spices; Sugar; Tapioca; Tomato sauce; Tomato-based salsa; Treacle; Vinegar; Yeast | ACTIVE | Dec 23, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MONTALBANO INDUSTRIA AGROALIMENTARE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by MONTALBANO INDUSTRIA AGROALIMENTARE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LEGNANO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 22, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 22, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |