Drawing for CA-TU-YA

USPTO serial 86466816

CA-TU-YA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CA-TU-YA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB10TH FLOOR 666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen beans, Pollen prepared as foodstuff, Processed, frozen, dried and cooked vegetables and fruits; Soups, Vegetable juices for cooking, Tofu; Food products made from tofu, namely, Hiyayakko, a Japanese dish consisting primarily of cold tofu and toppings; Meat; and Oyakodon, a Japanese dish consisting primarily of chicken and also including rice; Processed meat, Food products made from meat, namely, Menchi-katsu, which is fried cutlets containing mince, meat, cutlet and/or pork; Pork cutlets, Offal meat, namely, from lamb, beef, chicken; Food products made from milk, namely, cheese; Processed oils and fats for food; Seafood, namely, frozen and salted, not live; Processed, edible seaweed; Processed seafood; Prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of pork cutlets, with rice, as a main dish; Baking powderACTIVE—
030Flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, pasta and prepared pasta; Capers, Processed cereals; Prepared and prepackaged meals consisting primarily of rice or pasta, with pork cutlets, as a main dish; Baking powder; Malt for food purposes; Pastries; Bread; Ice cream; Sugar; Seasonings, other than spices; Salt; Tea; Coffee; Cocoa; Tea-based beverages; Ice; Meat tenderizers for household purposes; Food products made from egg, namely, Chawanmushi, a Japanese custard made from eggACTIVE—
043Japanese restaurant services; European-style cuisine restaurant services; Restaurant services; Buffet-style restaurant services; Providing food and drink in chain restaurants; Catering services; Chinese restaurant services; Serving food and drink in Cafes; Cafeteria services; Korean restaurant services; Restaurant services for providing pork cutletsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2017TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Nov 28, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 28, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 14, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 12, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 25, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 18, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance