USPTO serial 86466835
GROUNDED IN SCIENCE. WRAPPED IN UNDERSTANDING. FULL OF YOUR POTENTIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROUNDED IN SCIENCE. WRAPPED IN UNDERSTANDING. FULL OF YOUR POTENTIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Len Nannarone
LEN NANNARONE NANNARONE LAW GROUP78 WALNUT HILL DRIVESCITUATE, MA 02066UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Non-downloadable software and non-downloadable software application for mobile devices for providing and optimizing personalized health analytics; nondownloadable software and nondownloadable software application for mobile devices for providing and optimizing human biomarkers; non-downloadable software and non-downloadable software application for mobile devices providing information and personalized programs and recommendations for improving health analytics and biomarkers | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Segterra, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Segterra, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GROUNDED IN SCIENCE. WRAPPED IN UNDERSTANDING. FULL OF YOUR POTENTIAL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |