Drawing for BROOKLYN DEFENDER ALE

USPTO serial 86467661

BROOKLYN DEFENDER ALE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARESCA, MEREDITH Z
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BROOKLYN DEFENDER ALE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Y. Kim

RICHARD Y KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 NORTH CAPITOL STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-1531UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 11, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 7, 2016TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 7, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 7, 2016OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 12, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 17, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2015GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 16, 2015GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 16, 2015CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 13, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 10, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance