USPTO serial 86468026
PHONERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHONERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lomas de Chapultepec, MX
Lomas de Chapultepec, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elliot B. Gipson
ELLIOT B. GIPSON FAYER GIPSON LLP2029 CENTURY PARK EAST34TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Carrying and protective cases specially adapted for mobile electronic devices, namely, mobile phones and portable media players; armbands specially adapted for personal electronic devices, namely, mobile phones and portable media players; mobile telephone accessories, namely, belt clips; specialty holsters adapted for carrying personal electronic devices, namely, cell phones and personal digital assistants; battery packs and electronic docking stations sold as a unit for powering and use with mobile electronic devices; batteries and battery chargers for use as external power sources for mobile electronic devices, portable communication devices, mobile phones, and portable media players; battery chargers for use with cell phones, mobile electronic devices, portable communication devices, mobile phones, and portable media players; batteries for mobile telephones and electronic docking stations sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 26, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |