Drawing for GIGAHOUSE

USPTO serial 86468408

GIGAHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIGAHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison L Rapp

ALLISON L RAPP LUTZKER & LUTZKER LLP1233 20TH ST NWSTE 703WASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing high-speed Internet connectivity services featuring fiber optic technology; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks; providing multiple-user access to the Internet and other electronic communications networks; electronic mail and messaging services; transmission and broadcast of audio and video programming via television, computer, and wireless electronic devices; transmission and broadcast of audio and video programming via telecommunication networks; local and long distance telephone services; voice over internet protocol telephone services; telecommunication services, namely, providing advanced calling and messaging features in the nature of caller-ID, call forwarding, three-way calling, call transfer, call waiting, speed dial, voicemail, call hunt, wireless facsimile service, voicemail-to-email service, facsimile-to-email service, click-to-dial service, visual voice mail inbox service, incoming and outgoing call management service, auto attendant service, and tracking and reporting of missed, dialed and rejected calls; telephone call completion services for directory assistance customersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 22, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 21, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 20, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 3, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2016NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 17, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 1, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 19, 2015CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance