USPTO serial 86468436
MAXMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Lawnmowersmachines; Saw bladesparts of machines; Blade holdersparts of machines; Mixing machines; Beaters, electric; Stone working machines; Ramsmachines; Stone cutters; Capstans; Chucksparts of machines; Stropping machines; Toolsparts of machines; Electric machines and apparatus for Polishing; Grindstonesparts of machines; Drill chucksparts of machines; Chain saws; Glaziers' diamondsparts of machines; diamond blademachine parts; Jacksmachines; Parts of machines, namely, hammers; Power hammers; Pneumatic hammers; Electric hammers; Cowlingsparts of machines; Guardsparts of machines; Reciprocating saws; Shears, electric; Scissors, electric; Knives, electric; Electric hand drills; Riveting machines; Glue guns, electric; Parts of machines, namely, hoods; Parts of machines, namely, knives; Electric hand-held drills; Electric screwdrivers; Bending machines; Clippersmachines; Drilling headsparts of machines; Cutting machines; Nut-tapping machines; Bladesparts of machines; Electric angle grinder; Pneumatic staple guns; Spray guns for paint; Carbon brushes; Statorsparts of machines; Compressors; Electric spanners; electric grinding wheel machines; Hydraulic hand-held tools; hand-operated hydraulic press; pneumatic hand-held tools; Electric scraping machines; Compressed air machines; Welding machines, electric; Welding apparatus, gas-operated; Electric welding apparatus; Soldering apparatus, electric; Snow ploughs | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |