USPTO serial 86468588
JIMMY'S FAMOUS SEAFOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2016
- Examiner
- SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with JIMMY'S FAMOUS SEAFOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Baltimore, MD, US
Baltimore, MD, US
Baltimore, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel J. Haidle
Samuel J. Haidle HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC450 W FOURTH STREETROYAL OAK, MI 48067-2557United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Seafood seasonings sold only through restaurants and online retail store services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 19, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |