USPTO serial 86468681
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Catharines, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina D. Yates
CHRISTINA D. YATES DLA PIPER LLP (US)401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software to enable uploading, downloading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, commenting, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software as a service to enable uploading, downloading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, commenting, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |