USPTO serial 86469279
SURGE + DIAGNOSTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SURGE + DIAGNOSTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry B. Ward, III
HENRY B WARD III MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC100 N TRYON STSTE 4700CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-4003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical power filters and electrical power line conditioners; electrical regulators and protectors for managing over voltage and over electrical current incidents; electrical power filters for recording power quality incident data in electrical equipment; electrical power filters, electrical power line conditioners, and electrical regulators and protectors for managing over voltage and over electrical current incidents that incorporate IP enabled interface for remote management for cycling power, scheduling events, and eliminating stand-by loads in electrical equipment; electrical power filters, electrical power line conditioners, and electrical regulators and protectors for managing over voltage and over electrical current incidents that provide for programmable sequencing thereof; electrical power line conditioning system, namely power line conditioners and computer software for online remote access to customize, synthesize, monitor, and control power distribution, power outlets and power settings for electrical equipment | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| May 3, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |