USPTO serial 86469566
SPEARCISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPEARCISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Session
ROBERT SESSION Session Law GroupPO Box 1279Fresno, TX 77545-1279UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Electric scalpels; Electro-surgical motors being part of surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; Knives for surgical purposes; Medical and surgical cutters for cutting human or animal tissue and organs; Medical and surgical knives and cutters for cutting human or animal tissue and organs; Medical and surgical knives for cutting human or animal tissue and organs; Medical and surgical laparoscopes; Medical and surgical laparoscopes and catheters; Medical apparatus and instruments for use in surgery; Medical cutting devices; Medical devices, namely, surgical devices that facilitate the identification, separation or ablation of biologic tissues; Medical instruments for cutting tissue; Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical, dental or veterinary use; Surgical apparatus and instruments for use in ophthalmic surgery; Surgical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; Surgical apparatus for use in ophthalmic surgery; Surgical blades; Surgical devices and instruments; Surgical knives | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |