USPTO serial 86469658
UNRIVALED POTENCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNRIVALED POTENCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shabnam Malek
Shabnam Malek Brand & Branch LLP1714 Franklin Street #100-336Oakland, CA 94612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bakery desserts; Bakery goods; Bakery goods and dessert items, namely, cakes, cookies, pastries, candies, and frozen confections for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises; Bakery goods, namely, cookies, granola-based snack bars, brownies, chocolates, candy; Bakery products; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; Bases for bakery goods; Candies; Candy; Candy bars; Candy cake decorations; Candy coated apples; Candy coated popcorn; Candy decorations for cakes; Candy for food; Candy mints; Candy sprinkles; Candy with caramel; Candy with cocoa; Chocolate candies; Chocolates and chocolate based ready to eat candies and snacks; Gift baskets containing candy; Mixes for bakery goods; Mixes for bakery goods containing cornmeal; Mixes for candy making; Peppermint candy; Sugarless candies; Sweets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 5, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |