USPTO serial 86469676
PRICE PERCEPTION INDEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4757846Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 2015
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRICE PERCEPTION INDEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mooresville, NC
Sunnyvale, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Goode
Scott W. Goode LF, LLC1000 Lowe's BoulevardMooresville, NC 28117UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Cost price analysis; Price comparison services; Providing price comparison services in the field of retail merchandise via the Internet; Providing a website featuring information in the field of A/B test pricing strategies for online retailers; Business monitoring services, namely, profitability monitoring for online retailers via a website; Providing analysis of how customers perceive an online retailer's prices compared to that of competitors via a website; Providing a website featuring a financial index of measurement for how customers perceive an online retailer's prices compared to that of competitors; Providing a website featuring information in the field of customer perceptions of an online retailer's prices compared to that of competitors; Providing analysis for predicting the outcome of pricing strategies for online retailers via a website; Providing a website featuring information in the field of dynamic price optimization for online retailers; Providing pricing analysis for online retailers via a website; Providing testing and analyzing pricing strategies for online retailers via a website; Business monitoring services for online retailers to monitor competitor prices via website; Providing a website featuring information in the field of pricing strategy recommendations and analysis for online retailers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 2014 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for online retailers to perform benchmark analysis on pricing compared to competing online retailers; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for online retailers to run and review profitability analysis; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for dynamic price optimization for online retailers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LF, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Boomerang Commerce
- Other trademarks owned by Boomerang Commerce
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRICE PERCEPTION INDEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 9, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |