USPTO serial 86469859
REFERENCE POINT CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHWAB, CHAU CRISTIA H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REFERENCE POINT CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Justin Eldreth
115 S Saint Marys St Ste CRaleigh, NC 27603-1785UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting in the field of aerospace engineering; Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and implementation project management of aerospace technologies in the field of government relations, government policy analysis, legislation, the federal budget process, technologies and complex space systems; Research of aerospace technologies in the fields of government relations, government policy analysis, legislation, the federal budget process, technologies and complex space systems; Technology consultation and research in the field of aerospace technology research and analysis for government space systems; Technology consultation and research in the field of aerospace focused on government space systems including rocket propulsion and satellite subsystems for human space flight; Technology consultation in the field of aerospace focused on government space systems including rocket propulsion and satellite subsystems for human space flight | ACTIVE | May 15, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 9, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |