USPTO serial 86471278
PERSONAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4929283Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2016
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERSONAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Koto-ku, JP
Koto-ku, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD I. SOBELMAN
HOWARD I. SOBELMAN SNELL & WILMER LLP400 E. VAN BURENONE ARIZONA CENTERPHOENIX, AZ 85004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, computer software that uses artificial intelligence for responding to inquiries, queries, questions, instructions and/or comments; computer software that uses artificial intelligence for controlling systems, devices, software applications, facilities, and infrastructure; computer software that uses artificial intelligence for guiding behavior, solving problems and providing strategies, solutions and direction | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2015 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable artificial intelligence software for creating identity profiles for use in predicting human behavior | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2015 |
| 045 | Online social networking services | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2018 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 25, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |