Drawing for B BLEEPLE

USPTO serial 86471499

B BLEEPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with B BLEEPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kanika Radhakrishnan

KANIKA RADHAKRISHNAN Evergreen Valley Law Group2570 N 1st St Ste 200San Jose, CA 95131-1037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Web media content provider, namely, designing the form and content of homepages and web pages for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 2, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 2, 2016ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2016PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2016PRRGPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2016PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 21, 2016FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 25, 2016PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2016ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Mar 25, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2016PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 4, 2016PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 29, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 17, 2016TPETTEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance