Drawing for SNACKEEZ DUO

USPTO serial 86472355

SNACKEEZ DUO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SNACKEEZ DUO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason M. Drangel

JASON M DRANGEL EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 E 42ND STREETSUITE 2520NEW YORK, NY 10165-0011

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Beverageware; Household containers for foods; Thermal insulated containers for food or beverages; Bottles, sold empty for beverages; Cups for beverages; Insulating sleeve holder for beverage cups; Portable beverage and food container holderABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 9, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 9, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 24, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 14, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 29, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance