Drawing for Serial No. 86472689

USPTO serial 86472689

Serial No. 86472689

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 86472689?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Lasky

MICHAEL B. LASKY SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNERPO BOX 2938MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0938UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and marketing services; Dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet and via public and private wireless networks for display on mobile devices; Promoting the goods and services of others via a global computer network; Provision of market research information and feedbackACTIVE—
038Streaming of audiovisual and multimedia content via the internetACTIVE—
041Electronic publishing services, namely, publishing of text, video and graphic works of others online via computer and communications networks in the fields of entertainment, sports, education, social, political, cultural, economic, scientific and topics of general interest; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring entertainment, sports, education, social, political, cultural, economic, scientific and topics of general interest; Providing a website for entertainment purposes featuring videos, photos, and text about entertainment, sports, education, social, political, cultural, economic, scientific and topics of general interestACTIVE—
045On-line social networking servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2018MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 2, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2018RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Feb 21, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2017UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Jul 25, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 25, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2017UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Jul 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 9, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 9, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 9, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 18, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2015AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2014MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance