Drawing for 90 PROOF

USPTO serial 86472790

90 PROOF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 90 PROOF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

STEPHEN L. BAKER Baker and Rannells Pa92 E. Main St., Suite 302Somerville, NJ 08876UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003After-shave; After-sun lotions; Body lotions; Body sprays; Body wash; Cologne; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Fragranced skin care preparations, namely, skin cleansers, skin lotions and skin moisturizers; Fragrances for personal use; Lip balm; Lip cream; Lip gloss; Moisturizing preparations for the skin; Non-medicated skin care preparation, namely, body mist; Shave creams; Shaving foam; Shaving gels; Shaving lotion; Sun screen; Toilet waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 31, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 31, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 12, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance