USPTO serial 86472975
WEED CITY TELEVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEED CITY TELEVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence M. Wyles, Esq.
TERRENCE M. WYLES, ESQ. STARTUP IP LAW, LLC2404 S OAKLAND CIRAURORA, CO 80014-1816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for streaming Internet television programming | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertisement and publicity services by Internet television and websites; Preparing advertisements for others, namely, preparing video advertising and promotional videos for commercial use via the internet and television, digital cable and video-on-demand or download; Production of television commercials; Production of television commercials and public service announcements; Providing television advertising for others; Subscription to a television channel; Television advertising | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet; Broadcasting of Internet television programs; Internet protocol television (IPTV) transmission services; Subscription television broadcasting; Television broadcasting; Television programme broadcasting; Transmission and delivery of video and audio content via the Internet; Video broadcasting; Video broadcasting services via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of creation, development, and production of television programming; Entertainment services, namely, an ongoing series featuring issues related to the legal marijuana industry provided through webcasts and Internet television; Production of sound and music video recordings; Television show production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRADFORD HOLDING GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WEED CITY TELEVISION
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |