USPTO serial 86474201
EHANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 2017
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EHANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Owner
GUANGZHOU EHANG INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
TIANHE DISTRICT, GUANGZHOU, CN
Other trademarks owned by GUANGZHOU EHANG INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
San Carlos, CA, US
Redwood City, CA, US
Redwood City, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Prakash NAMA
121 Moore StPrinceton, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Consumer electronics products in the nature of downloadable mobile applications for control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); consumer electronics products in the nature of remote controls for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); consumer electronics products in the nature of software for flying, controlling, and monitoring drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and unmanned aerial systems (UAS); consumer electronics products in the nature of computer software, hardware and peripheral devices for use in navigation, namely, navigation systems comprised of sensors and GPS which can be used for unmanned aerial devices | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2014 |
| 012 | Drones; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2014 |
| 028 | Consumer electronics, namely, electronic toy vehicles | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GUANGZHOU EHANG INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Ehang, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ehang, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ehang, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named EHANG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |