USPTO serial 86474664
FORTALEZA GUITARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2017
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FORTALEZA GUITARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LAKE ELSINORE, CA
LAKE ELSINORE, CA
LAKE ELSINORE, CA
LAKE ELSINORE, CA
LAKE ELSINORE, CA
LAKE ELSINORE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Garcia, Jr.
David Garcia, Jr. Attorney at LawP.O. Box 380614San Antonio, TX 78268UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Acoustic guitars; Carrying cases for musical instruments; Cases for musical instruments; [ Guitar bridges; Guitar parts, namely, machine heads; ] Guitar picks; Guitar straps; Guitar strings; Guitars; Musical instruments, namely, bajoquinto, bajosexto, 12 string accoustic guitar, 6 string accoustic guitar, arpa, accoustic bass guitar; Picks for stringed instruments; String instruments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 28, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AVILEZ, ARIEL
- Other trademarks owned by AVILEZ, ARIEL
- Other trademarks owned by AVILEZ, ARIEL
- Other trademarks owned by GAXIOLA, MIGUEL A.
- Other trademarks owned by GAXIOLA, MIGUEL A.
- Other trademarks owned by GAXIOLA, MIGUEL A.
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Similar marks named FORTALEZA GUITARS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2024 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |