Drawing for KARETECH

USPTO serial 86474816

KARETECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KARETECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas J. McEvoy

DOUGLAS J. MCEVOY GIFFORD, KRASS, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, P.2701 TROY CENTER DR STE 330TROY, MI 48084-4741UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical transport, diagnostic and treatment assemblies, namely, stretchers for patient transport, low friction pads for sliding patients to and from a stretcher and bed, moveable therapeutic beds, medical apparatus' for diagnosing health conditions such as suspected heart attacks and for treating respiratory conditionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 5, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 29, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 20, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance