Drawing for RED HOUSE ROCK & BLUES CLUB

USPTO serial 86475545

RED HOUSE ROCK & BLUES CLUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED HOUSE ROCK & BLUES CLUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vivian Ortiz Ponce

VIVIAN ORTIZ PONCE MARCAS ESTADOS UNIDOSPO BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Arranging and conducting of concerts; nights-clubs; organization of cultural shows; organization of events for cultural purposes; party planning; presentation of live show performancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 28, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 28, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 17, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 23, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 29, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 28, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 27, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2017WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2017WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 26, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 19, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 18, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 25, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance