USPTO serial 86475788
BE BRILLIANT TODAY AND EVERYDAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BE BRILLIANT TODAY AND EVERYDAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa A. Nowak
Melissa A. Nowak Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, books, magazines, periodicals, pamphlets, brochures, newsletters, flyers, advertisements and product manuals in the fields of natural health products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |