Drawing for CORDANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 86475847

CORDANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUNT, LEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORDANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander J.A. Garcia

ALEXANDER J.A. GARCIA PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Cloud computing featuring software for viewing and analyzing test results in the fields of medical testing, namely, testing during substance abuse treatment, testing used in medical treatments and genetic testing; cloud computing featuring software for viewing and analyzing test results in the fields of drug and alcohol use testing; cloud computing featuring software for automating business workflows and decision makingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 4, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 7, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2015CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2015GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2015GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2015CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance