USPTO serial 86476275
TRAINSCANNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRAINSCANNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
92300 Levallois-Perret, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Drangel
JASON M. DRANGEL EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 E 42ND ST STE 2410NEW YORK, NY 10165-0011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Rail transportation systems comprised of computer hardware and software, designed to analyse and diagnose the condition of rail infrastructure equipment, rail vehicles and components thereof, in particular the body, wheels, brake pads, pantograph contact strips, doors, antennas and fixtures; electronic control and diagnostic devices that may be attached to a railway transportation structure, a signal gantry, on handles, upright panels, or any other strut system for the purpose of allowing the passage of rail vehicles to monitor whether the vehicles are properly operational; electronic control and diagnostic devices consisting of optical and data display equipment in particular lasers, surveillance cameras and data transmission equipment comprised of computer hardware and software for the measurement, monitoring and control of rail system infrastructure the purpose of to monitor whether the vehicles are properly operational; Management computer software and computer hardware for the processing and analysis of data collected from a rail analytical and diagnostic computer system for the purpose of providing information concerning ongoing or preventive maintenance of rail infrastructure equipment and/or rail vehicles and components thereof, in particular the body, wheels, brake pads, pantograph contact strips, doors, antennas and fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance services for rail transportation infrastructure systems designed to analyse and diagnose the condition of rail infrastructure, rail vehicles and components thereof, in particular the body, wheels, brake pads, pantograph contact strips, doors, antennas and fixtures; installation and maintenance services for electronic control and diagnostic devices that may be attached to a railway transportation structure, a signal gantry, on handles, upright panels, or any other strut system for the purpose of allowing the passage of rail vehicles to monitor whether the vehicles are properly operational; installation and maintenance services for electronic control and diagnostic devices consisting of optical and data display equipment in particular lasers, surveillance cameras and data transmission equipment comprised of computer hardware and software for the measurement, monitoring and control of rail system infrastructure the purpose of to monitor whether the vehicles are properly operational; Installation and maintenance services for computer hardware used for the processing and analysis of data collected from a rail analytical and diagnostic computer system for the purpose of providing information concerning ongoing or preventive maintenance of rail infrastructure equipment and/or rail vehicles and components thereof, in particular the body, wheels, brake pads, pantograph contact strips, doors, antennas and fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation and maintenance services of computer management software used for the processing and analysis of data collected from a rail analytical and diagnostic computer system for the purpose of providing information concerning ongoing or preventive maintenance of rail infrastructure equipment and/or rail vehicles and components thereof, in particular the body, wheels, brake pads, pantograph contact strips, doors, antennas and fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |