USPTO serial 86476803
MALBEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5166869Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2017
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MALBEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Provincia de Mendoza, AR
Provincia de Mendoza, AR
Provincia de Mendoza, AR
Sheperdstown, WV
Sheperdstown, WV
Sheperdstown, WV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Ortiz Ponce
Vivian Ortiz Ponce MARCAS ESTADOS UNIDOSP.O. Box 9024163San Juan, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned fruits and vegetables; Consommes; Cooked fruits and vegetables; Corn oil; Crystallized fruits; Dried fruit and vegetables; Edible oils and edible fats; Fruit jellies; Fruits preserved in alcohol; Marmalades and jams; Olive oil; Powdered milk; Prepared walnuts; Preserved fruits and vegetables; Preserved peas; Preserved, dried and cooked olives; Processed almonds; Processed beans; Processed garlic; Processed olives; Processed vegetables; Raisins; Soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; Soybean milk; Tomato extracts; Tomato puree, none of the foregoing containing wine or Malbec grapes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 10, 2016 |
| 032 | Beers; Drinking water; Fruit nectars; Grape juice; Lemonades; Mineral and aerated waters; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic cordials; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Non-alcoholic sparkling fruit juice beverages; Soft drinks, Vegetable juices; none of the foregoing containing wine or Malbec grapes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 10, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FALCONI, PABLO JAVIER
- Other trademarks owned by FALCONI, PABLO JAVIER
- Other trademarks owned by FALCONI, PABLO JAVIER
- Other trademarks owned by ACCURSO, RICHARD WALTER
- Other trademarks owned by ACCURSO, RICHARD WALTER
- Other trademarks owned by ACCURSO, RICHARD WALTER
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MALBEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 24, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |