USPTO serial 86477198
VOLUMINGSENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOLUMINGSENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Corey K. Cho
COREY K. CHO SALIWANCHIK, LLOYD & EISENSCHENK, P.A.PO BOX 142950GAINESVILLE, FL 32614-2950UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair balsam; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair care products, namely, heat protection sprays; Hair conditioners; Hair creams; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair glaze; Hair lacquers; Hair lotions; Hair mascara; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair rinses; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair spray; Hair tonics; Oils for hair conditioning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |