Drawing for M.A.S.K. - MOBILE ARMORED STRIKE KOMMAND

USPTO serial 86477325

M.A.S.K. - MOBILE ARMORED STRIKE KOMMAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M.A.S.K. - MOBILE ARMORED STRIKE KOMMAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sara Beccia

Sara Beccia Hasbro, Inc.1027 Newport AvenuePawtucket, RI 02862UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of motion pictures, ongoing television programs and television game shows, and an animated television series; educational and entertainment services, namely, ongoing programs in the field of children's entertainment accessible by television, satellite, radio, audio, video, electronic media and computer networks; providing news and information in the field of children's educational activities and entertainment; entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games and interactive multi player online games via global networks; fan club services; entertainment services in the nature of competitions in the field of entertainment trivia; providing computer databases, information, and websites, all featuring audio entertainment, visual entertainment and audiovisual entertainment via global computer networks; entertainment services, namely, the production of DVDs and soundtrack albumsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 18, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 31, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2018INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jan 17, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 17, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Aug 17, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 26, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 17, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 8, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 15, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance