USPTO serial 86477680
RGL RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RGL RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katrin Lewertoff
Katrin Lewertoff Ferdinand IP LLC1221 Post Road EastSuite 302Westport, CT 06880Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools, namely, wire wrap screens for use as sand control devices in pipes in the oil, gas and energy industries; Machine tools, namely, steam injection flow control joints for use in streamed distribution applications in the oil, gas and energy industries; Machine tools, namely, inflow and outflow control joints for use in the streamed distribution applications in the oil, gas and energy industries; Seamed slotted liner for sand control for use in wells in the oil, gas and energy industries; Seamed slotted liner for sand control in wells manufactured according to specific reservoir sand distribution, to provide self-cleaning anti-plugging slot profiles which prevent pore throat and slot plugging; Seamed slotted liner used in wells in the oil, gas and energy industries to reduce slot plugging by providing anti-plugging mechanics to the surface of a previously slotted pipe; Sand control devices, namely, seamed slotted liners, for use in wells in the oil, gas and energy industries; High performance slotted liner for sand control for use in wells in the oil, gas and energy industries; Coated high performance slotted liner for sand control for use in the wells in the oil, gas and energy industries; Uncoated slotted liner for use for sand control in wells in the oil, gas and energy industries; High performance slotted liner in which machining ridges on the walls of the slot are minimized through high speed and low feed rate cutting for sand control for use in the wells in oil, gas and energy industries; High performance slotted liner coated with a temperature, chemical and abrasion resistant coating resulting in a smooth slot surface and which results in minimized long term plugging as well as abrasion and temperature resistance for sand control; Sand control devices to reduce well plugging for use in wells in the oil, gas and energy industries; Sand control devices to reduce well plugging for thermal well completion in the oil, gas and energy industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Providing enhanced oil recovery services to third parties in the oil, gas and energy industries; Providing sand control products and services to third parties in the oil, gas and energy industries; Providing steam distribution products and services to third parties in the oil, gas and energy industries; Providing maintenance and repair services for machinery, rigs and wells to third parties in the oil, gas and energy industries; Sand control services for oil and gas wells in the fields of oil, gas and energy exploration and production; Sand control services in oil and gas wells for enhanced oil recovery within the oil, gas and energy industries; Building, construction and repair services in the oil, gas and energy industries, namely, the construction, maintenance and repair of oil and gas wells and water wells | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Providing manufacturing and machining services to third parties in the oil, gas and energy industries; Providing production and manufacturing of specialized tools to third parties in the oil, gas and energy industries; Manufacture and design of slotted liners to the order and specification of others; Manufacture and design of custom built tools for horizontal drilling to the order and specification of others; Design and construction of custom horizontal completion tools; Design, manufacture and installation of slotting equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services in the oil, gas and energy industries; Design, development, improvement, manufacturing, testing and implementation of new technology, products and processes for others in the oil, gas and energy industries; Engineering design; Mechanical engineering services; Consulting and engineering services provided to others in the oil, gas and energy industries; Providing technical research services to others; Development of new technology, products and processes primarily for use oil and gas drilling, well construction and sand control; Research and development of new technology, products and processes for others; Preparation of engineering reports and design drawings; Evaluation and assessment of new technology, products and processes in the oil, gas and energy industries; Providing consulting services in the oil, gas and energy industries; Providing consulting services in the sand control industry; Consulting in the field of well bore sand control; Providing slot width modeling and testing services in the sand control industry; Providing flow control testing services in the sand control industry; Providing slot density testing and calculations in the sand control industry; Engineering, consulting and testing services in the oil, gas and energy industries; Providing testing and analysis services with respect to finite elements and laser particle size; Research and development services in the oil, gas and energy industries; Testing analysis and evaluation of tools and processes used in the oil, gas and energy industries; Providing sand control design and review services, namely, modeling of particle size distribution and flow testing services; Providing sand control and core flow testing services in the oil, gas and energy industries; Providing thermal technical design and review services, namely, using simulation tools and models to analyse steam distribution; Preparing and providing reports and recommendations for slot specifications required for effective sand control in the oil, gas and energy industries; Developing slot width models in the oil, gas and energy industries; Development of engineering models and programs designed to achieve optimal slot configuration and optimal steam distribution profiling in oil, gas and energy industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RGL RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RGL RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |