USPTO serial 86477686
PROSLOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROSLOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. McDonald
ROBERT D. MCDONALD DENTONS CANADA LLP2900, 10180 - 101 STREETEDMONTON, ALBERTA, T5J3V5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Oil, gas and water well equipment, namely sand control devices for use with well drilling machines and rigs in the oil, gas and energy industries, namely, high performance seamed slotted liner, consisting of a perforated liner for use in sand control wells; Oil, gas and water well equipment , namely sand control devices for use with well drilling machines and rigs in the oil, gas and energy industries, namely, coated high performance seamed slotted liner, consisting of a perforated liner for use in sand control wells; Oil, gas and water well equipment, namely sand control devices for use with well drilling machines and rigs in the oil, gas and energy industries, namely, uncoated slotted liner, consisting of a perforated liner for use in sand control wells; Oil, gas and water well equipment, namely sand control devices for use with well drilling machines and rigs in the oil, gas and energy industries, namely, high performance slotted liner in which machining ridges on the walls of the slot are minimized through high speed and low feed rate cutting, consisting of a perforated liner for use in sand control wells; Oil, gas and water well equipment, namely sand control devices for use with well drilling machines and rigs in the oil, gas and energy industries, namely, high performance slotted liner coated with a temperature, chemical and abrasion resistant coating resulting in a smooth slot surface and which results in minimized long term plugging as well as abrasion and temperature resistance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |