Drawing for SPLENDID COMFORT

USPTO serial 86478071

SPLENDID COMFORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPLENDID COMFORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David C. Brezina

DAVID C. BREZINA LADAS & PARRY LLP224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020MattressesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 19, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 18, 2017GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 18, 2017CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 16, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance