Drawing for BLACKBOX

USPTO serial 86478281

BLACKBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLACKBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachel Jacques

Rachel Jacques MASCHOFF BRENNAN1389 Center DriveSuite 300Park City, UT 84098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Electronic cigarettes; Electronic hookahs; Smoking alternatives, namely, smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipe; Electronic smoking oral vaporizers; Electronic cigars, namely, vapor cigars; Electronic cigarette components in the nature of electronic nicotine inhalation devices comprised of empty electronic cigarette refill cartridges and electronic cigarette refill cartridges filled with chemical liquid flavorings, electronic cigarette atomizers, electronic cigarette cartomizers in the nature of combination empty electronic cigarette refill cartridges and atomizers, and refill liquid nicotine solutions distributed as a unit; Electronic hookah liquid consisting of chemical flavorings in liquid form used to fill electronic hookahs or electronic hookah cartridges sold as a unit with electronic hookahs; Vapor liquid consisting of chemical flavorings in liquid form used to fill electronic vaporizers or vaporizing cartridges sold as a unit with electronic hookahs, cigarettes and cigarsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 30, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 30, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 12, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance