USPTO serial 86478563
JOVIL PRECISION COIL WIDING MACHINES UNIVERSAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JOVIL PRECISION COIL WIDING MACHINES UNIVERSAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jovil Universal Zhongshan Ltd.
Guangdong Province, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Chucks for power drills; Concrete finishing machines; Drill chucks for power drills; Ground surface finishing and compacting machines; Machine parts, namely, joints and joint parts for connecting sliding strips, plates and guides; Machine parts, namely, work holding fixtures for precision machining applications; Machine tools, namely clamps for use in the precision clamping of work pieces; Machine tools, namely jaws for use in the precision clamping of work pieces; Machine tools, namely vices for use in the precision clamping of work pieces; Machine tools, namely, powered machines for cutting or shaping or finishing metals or other materials; Metal clamps used for holding piece parts on machine tool tables; Metalworking machine tools; Paper reeling machines; Plywood finishing machines; Power-operated garden hose reels; Precision machine tools, namely, hard metal tools, high speed steel (HSS) tools, carbide tools, ceramic tools, poly crystalline diamond (PCD) tools, and diamond-coated and diamond-uncoated tools, and hard metal tools, all for use in the cutting and forming of materials by others; Pressure regulators being parts of machines; Regulators being parts of machines; Silk yarn reeling machines; Slides, namely, powered ramps; Stands for machines; Tables specially adapted to hold powered machinery; Trims for engine exhausts; Wire drawing machines; Yarn reeling machines | ACTIVE | Aug 8, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |