USPTO serial 86480645
SUPERREACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERREACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Seoul 153-803, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jun-Hwa Jeong
JUN-HWA JEONG RABIN & BERDO, P.C.1101 14TH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005-5633UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital video recorders; Video recorders; Cameras; Digital cameras; Closed circuit television cameras; Audiovisual receivers; Apparatus for transmitting and reproducing sound or images; Recording and playing devices for sound and image carriers; Computer software for use in the field of digital security; Computer application software for mobile phones for use in the field of digital security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |