USPTO serial 86481820
WHATSWHAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHATSWHAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
JULIE DALKE LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable software where users can read, post, recommend and favourite curated recommendations, user recommendations, recommendations, ratings, reviews, and referrals relating to restaurants, events, night life, shopping, concierge services, service providers, organizations, and public services; downloadable software for social media where users can share curated content, user generated content and content; downloadable software for making curated recommendations relating to restaurants, events, night life, shopping, concierge services, service providers, organizations, and public services; downloadable software for advertising, promoting, and marketing the goods and services of others featuring coupons, rebates, discounts, links to the retail websites of others, integration with the retail website of others, upgrades, and group buying; downloadable software for assisting others to set up e-commerce, commerce, and merchant portals; downloadable software for selling, ordering, and delivering the goods and services of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | providing a website featuring curated recommendations, user recommendations, recommendations, ratings, reviews, and referrals, posted by users, relating to restaurants, events, night life, shopping, concierge services, service providers, organizations, and public services; advertising, promoting, and marketing the goods and services of others by providing coupons, rebates, discounts, links to the retail websites of others, integration with the retail website of others, upgrades, and group buying | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing a website for social media featuring technology that enables users to share curated content, user generated content and content; providing online non-downloadable software for making curated recommendations relating to restaurants, events, night life, shopping, concierge services, service providers, organizations, and public services; providing online non-downloadable software for assisting others to set up e-commerce, commerce, and merchant portals; providing online non-downloadable software for selling, ordering, and delivering the goods and services of others; providing online non-downloadable software featuring coupons, rebates, discounts, links to the retail websites of others, integration with the retail website of others, upgrades, and group buying | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |