USPTO serial 86482074
CONFREMAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, SUI
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONFREMAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carolyn E. Knecht
CAROLYN E. KNECHT IPHORGAN LTD.195 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD.SUITE 125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Intent to Use) Meat and meat extracts; poultry and poultry extracts; game and game extracts; fish, not live; processed vegetables and fruits; edible oils and fats; marmalades; jams; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; jellies for food; eggs; (Based on Intent to Use) fish extracts, not live; processed seafood and processed seafood extracts; frozen, prepared, partly prepared and semi-prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, poultry, fish, seafood, vegetables or fruit; prepared delicatessen vegetable salads also containing meat, poultry, game, fish, seafood, and vegetables and fruit | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2016 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |