USPTO serial 86482409
CUCINA DI MARINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CUCINA DI MARINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
JAMES R MENKER Holley & Menker PaPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233-1715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cooking oils; edible oils; antipasto spreads; tomato products, namely, dried tomatoes, dried tomatoes in oil, tomato paste, canned tomatoes; processed edible nuts; canned fruits and vegetables; preserves, namely, fruit preserves, meat preserves, fish preserves, vegetable preserves; vegetable preserves, namely, marinated vegetables, grilled vegetables, pickled vegetables; processed olives; processed anchovies; dried figs; cheeses; spreads, namely, fruit spreads, nut spreads, vegetable spreads, bruschetta spreads, cheese spreads, chocolate spreads, humus spreads, and bean spreads; and dips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Pasta; vinegars; balsamic vinegar; tomato sauces; spices; spice rubs; spice blends; herbs, namely, processed herbs and dried herbs; condiments, namely, minced and whole garlic, pepper sauces and pepper paste for use as a seasoning, chili oil, honey, pesto, pesto sauce, vegetable toppings; biscuits; baked goods, namely, bread, pastries, muffins, pies, cakes, pizzas, loaves, cookies, buns, biscotti; coffee, espresso, tea; sauces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |