USPTO serial 86485478
EMERALD TRIANGLE SESSION INDIA PALE ALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMERALD TRIANGLE SESSION INDIA PALE ALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M. Kent
ALEXA L LEWIS MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1683UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEER AND ALE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |