Drawing for MULTITRADER

USPTO serial 86486247

MULTITRADER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTITRADER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Noblitt

DANIEL J NOBLITT THE NOBLITT GROUP PLLC8800 N GAINEY CENTER DRSUITE 279SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258-2123

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; business administration; office functions; advertising and marketing services; conducting market surveys; online advertising on a computer network; computerized file management; providing statistical information, namely, gathering, arranging and disseminating statistical information; cost price analysis; office functions, namely, storage and retrieval of information; business consultancy; business consultancy relating to the administration of information technology; consultancy relating to business efficiency; data management consultancy regarding data processing services; professional consultancy relating to business matters; consultancy relating to data processing services; consultancy relating to the preparation of business statistics; business administration consultancy; business consultancy services relating to data processing; business consultancy services relating to marketing; consultancy relating to business document managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2016TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Dec 13, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 13, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 26, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 26, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 23, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 23, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 10, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2014MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 27, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance