USPTO serial 86486727
SYSTEMAGIC LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYSTEMAGIC LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew L. Frisbee
MATTHEW L. FRISBEE FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs and software for the collection, compilation, processing, transmission and dissemination of location data, flight information and airport conditions; electronic database software featuring travel information regarding location data, flight information and airport conditions recorded on computer media and software for calculating and displaying time estimates; downloadable electronic database software featuring travel information regarding location data, flight information and airport conditions for calculating and displaying time estimates; interactive social media computer software that provides travel information and receives inputs regarding airport conditions; interactive social media computer software to enable the transmission of travel information, time estimates, advertisements, and status via telecommunications networks; interactive social media computer software enabling exchange of information among users | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |