USPTO serial 86487053
LEGENDARY ARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEGENDARY ARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bootcheck
MICHAEL J. BOOTCHECK MICHAEL J. BOOTCHECK, LLC861 COMMERCE DR SWCONYERS, GA 30094-6614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of historical and fantasy reproduction edged weapons and armor; retail store services in the field of historical reproduction accessories; retail store services in the field of historical reproduction period uniforms; retail store services in the field of current U.S. Military uniforms and gear; retail store services in the field of historical and fantasy reproduction edged weapons and armor including swords and sword parts, sword canes and sword umbrellas, knives and knife parts, bayonets and bayonet parts, helmets, shields, and armor; retail store services in the field of historical reproduction accessories including scabbards, knots, chains, frogs and throgs for swords, scabbards for knives, frogs and scabbards for bayonets, leather and cloth belts, sashes and slings, belt buckles, leather cartridge boxes, pistol boxes and cap boxes, and pouches, canteens, leather holsters, bugles, horns and bugle cords, plates, mugs, coffee pots and utensils, blankets, ponchos, haversacks, spittoons, flags, display cases and stands for swords and knives; retail store services in the field of historical reproduction period uniforms including shirts, pants, jackets and coats, vests, boots, shoes, brogans, gaiters, and spurs, leather gloves and gauntlets and cloth gloves, hats, caps and kepis, havelocks, military epaulettes and shoulder knots, military shoulder boards, military hat and collar rank insignia, military corps badges, military hat cords, military chevrons, Masonic hat and robe patches; retail store services in the field of Current U.S. Military uniforms and gear including Battle Dress Uniforms (BDUs), Army Combat Uniforms (ACUs), Tactical Uniforms, shirts and pants, military caps and hats, military t-shirts, camouflage clothing, boots, shoes, socks and gaiters, caps and hats, gloves, tents and sleeping bags and camping gear, jackets and coats, wallets, belts, paracords and buckles, utility ropes; retail store services in the field of clothing; retail store services in the field of armor; retail store services in the field of uniforms; retail store services in the field of weapons | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |